<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Google Authenticator (and implementing it on Linux)</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kgarner.com/blog/archives/2011/02/22/google-authenticator-and-implementing-it-on-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kgarner.com/blog/archives/2011/02/22/google-authenticator-and-implementing-it-on-linux/</link> <description>Keith&#039;s attempts to fix the cable of life</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:27:32 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: Use Google Authenticator to login to your linux box - Der PCFreak Blog</title><link>http://www.kgarner.com/blog/archives/2011/02/22/google-authenticator-and-implementing-it-on-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-45368</link> <dc:creator>Use Google Authenticator to login to your linux box - Der PCFreak Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:34:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kgarner.com/blog/?p=1188#comment-45368</guid> <description><![CDATA[[...] Keith Garner Google Authenticator (and implementing it on Linux) [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Keith Garner Google Authenticator (and implementing it on Linux) [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: derp</title><link>http://www.kgarner.com/blog/archives/2011/02/22/google-authenticator-and-implementing-it-on-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-45037</link> <dc:creator>derp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:57:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kgarner.com/blog/?p=1188#comment-45037</guid> <description><![CDATA[Thanks for the mention on the patch - solved an issue I was having on how to get users to be able to run the setup on their own.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention on the patch &#8211; solved an issue I was having on how to get users to be able to run the setup on their own.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dugsong</title><link>http://www.kgarner.com/blog/archives/2011/02/22/google-authenticator-and-implementing-it-on-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-44073</link> <dc:creator>dugsong</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:34:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kgarner.com/blog/?p=1188#comment-44073</guid> <description><![CDATA[An alternative approach is not to use PAM at all, which is what we did for our open-source duo_unix package, (which supports two-factor auth via one-time passcodes, but also phone callback, SMS, and smartphone push). This allows a user to enable two-factor auth without admin intervention - and also protect SSH pubkey login, which is mutually exclusive with PAM currently in OpenSSH.See our blog post about our open-source release here: http://blog.duosecurity.com/2011/04/announcing-duos-two-factor-authentication-for-unix/]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An alternative approach is not to use PAM at all, which is what we did for our open-source duo_unix package, (which supports two-factor auth via one-time passcodes, but also phone callback, SMS, and smartphone push). This allows a user to enable two-factor auth without admin intervention &#8211; and also protect SSH pubkey login, which is mutually exclusive with PAM currently in OpenSSH.</p><p>See our blog post about our open-source release here: <a href="http://blog.duosecurity.com/2011/04/announcing-duos-two-factor-authentication-for-unix/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.duosecurity.com/2011/04/announcing-duos-two-factor-authentication-for-unix/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Keith Garner</title><link>http://www.kgarner.com/blog/archives/2011/02/22/google-authenticator-and-implementing-it-on-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-43889</link> <dc:creator>Keith Garner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:00:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kgarner.com/blog/?p=1188#comment-43889</guid> <description><![CDATA[suman,This module seems to be geared for interactive text based use (ssh, telnet, etc.)  I don&#039;t think it&#039;ll work for a web application.  Google has been following an open standard, so I expect to see some libraries to help implement this for apache and/or various web frameworks.  But this doesn&#039;t seem to be it.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>suman,</p><p>This module seems to be geared for interactive text based use (ssh, telnet, etc.)  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll work for a web application.  Google has been following an open standard, so I expect to see some libraries to help implement this for apache and/or various web frameworks.  But this doesn&#8217;t seem to be it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: suman</title><link>http://www.kgarner.com/blog/archives/2011/02/22/google-authenticator-and-implementing-it-on-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-43887</link> <dc:creator>suman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 04:09:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kgarner.com/blog/?p=1188#comment-43887</guid> <description><![CDATA[I am fairly naive on the PAM module. Does this authentication set up only for users of the system by default?? Is there an easy way to enable this for users of a web application?? Kinda like the way google implemented for gmail???]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am fairly naive on the PAM module. Does this authentication set up only for users of the system by default?? Is there an easy way to enable this for users of a web application?? Kinda like the way google implemented for gmail???</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Keith Garner</title><link>http://www.kgarner.com/blog/archives/2011/02/22/google-authenticator-and-implementing-it-on-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-43828</link> <dc:creator>Keith Garner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:59:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kgarner.com/blog/?p=1188#comment-43828</guid> <description><![CDATA[Doug, that&#039;s a really good idea.  The only thing i don&#039;t like about it is that it requires admin intervention to do that.  In some situations that may be desirable.  For my needs, the non-admin-attention version is better.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug, that&#8217;s a really good idea.  The only thing i don&#8217;t like about it is that it requires admin intervention to do that.  In some situations that may be desirable.  For my needs, the non-admin-attention version is better.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Doug Kelly</title><link>http://www.kgarner.com/blog/archives/2011/02/22/google-authenticator-and-implementing-it-on-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-43821</link> <dc:creator>Doug Kelly</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 05:11:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kgarner.com/blog/?p=1188#comment-43821</guid> <description><![CDATA[An alternate idea to the &quot;all or nothing&quot; problem: use PAM to ignore the authenticator if you&#039;re not in a certain group.  The following configuration checks if the user is in group &quot;secure,&quot; and if they are, the authenticator is used.  Otherwise, it is ignored.  (The logic is somewhat backwards here, but it works.)auth            [default=ignore success=1]      pam_succeed_if.so quiet user notingroup secure auth            required        pam_google_authenticator.so]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An alternate idea to the &#8220;all or nothing&#8221; problem: use PAM to ignore the authenticator if you&#8217;re not in a certain group.  The following configuration checks if the user is in group &#8220;secure,&#8221; and if they are, the authenticator is used.  Otherwise, it is ignored.  (The logic is somewhat backwards here, but it works.)</p><p>auth            [default=ignore success=1]      pam_succeed_if.so quiet user notingroup secure<br /> auth            required        pam_google_authenticator.so</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Keith Garner</title><link>http://www.kgarner.com/blog/archives/2011/02/22/google-authenticator-and-implementing-it-on-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-43619</link> <dc:creator>Keith Garner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:14:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kgarner.com/blog/?p=1188#comment-43619</guid> <description><![CDATA[I just set this up on a second machine, and below is working again for me.  I wonder what the difference is.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just set this up on a second machine, and below is working again for me.  I wonder what the difference is.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dbt</title><link>http://www.kgarner.com/blog/archives/2011/02/22/google-authenticator-and-implementing-it-on-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-43616</link> <dc:creator>dbt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 02:57:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kgarner.com/blog/?p=1188#comment-43616</guid> <description><![CDATA[Weird.  On my ubuntu machine it didn&#039;t work unless I put the auth reuqired pam_google_authenticator.so line above @include common-auth]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird.  On my ubuntu machine it didn&#8217;t work unless I put the auth reuqired pam_google_authenticator.so line above @include common-auth</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tweets that mention Google Authenticator (and implementing it on Linux) « You can imagine where it goes from here. -- Topsy.com</title><link>http://www.kgarner.com/blog/archives/2011/02/22/google-authenticator-and-implementing-it-on-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-43603</link> <dc:creator>Tweets that mention Google Authenticator (and implementing it on Linux) « You can imagine where it goes from here. -- Topsy.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:37:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kgarner.com/blog/?p=1188#comment-43603</guid> <description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Keith T. Garner, Jeff Jarmoc. Jeff Jarmoc said: RT @ktgeek: Blog spew: Google Authenticator (and implementing it on Linux) http://bit.ly/fyQTq6 [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Keith T. Garner, Jeff Jarmoc. Jeff Jarmoc said: RT @ktgeek: Blog spew: Google Authenticator (and implementing it on Linux) <a href="http://bit.ly/fyQTq6" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/fyQTq6</a> [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/33 queries in 0.016 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 532/569 objects using disk: basic

 Served from: www.kgarner.com @ 2013-05-25 16:32:10 by W3 Total Cache -->